![]() Rubber2405's Response to RUBBER2405's Review My camera is around 23 years old and I am not exaggerating when I say it still looks like brand new, which is a show of its build quality. The light meter that is built in is very accurate (tested against an Olympus OM10 and a Weston Master 2 Light Meter), when used with the Olympus lenses. It has full manual controls which gives it great versatility. The Minolta lenses are hard to get hold of now, they have been looked after anyway. That lot cost me about £250 about 7-8 years ago. I have bought a 70-210mm Minolta MD lens (fantastic quality for a zoom lens), a sigma 28mm wide angle, which has half stops on it and is very good quality for build and photo quality, and a rubber eye cup. Quite large for an SLR compared to say, the Olympus OM10, which is in greater supply. ![]() It was so good, that Leica supposedly bought it and put their own name on it.Ī very good camera. Particularly the elusive Minolta 24mm ultra wide angle lens, which is rare, but reputed to be one of the best lenses ever made by any manufacturer. ![]() Fully manual controls or aperture priority.ĭifficult to get quality lenses for it now, as people seem to keep hold of them. Excellent quality OEM lenses (buy Minolta where you can, they were the best lenses).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |